United Kingdom
India
Deutschland
France
Canada
España
Australia
България
Italia
中国
日本[Comparison] Intel Core i7-1195G7 vs Core i7-1165G7 – hardly any difference
ULV-series CPUs are getting better and better since architectures are using smaller processes, all of which improve both efficiency and performance. Today we have two very similar processors, if not identical processors.
The Core i7-1195G7 and Core i7-1165G7 share the same architecture, core count, and cache size. They even use the same iGPU, the Iris Xe Graphics G7. This comparison will likely come down to the laptops themselves and their ability to harness the chip’s performance properly.
Today we are comparing the Intel Core i7-1195G7 against the Core i7-1165G7.
You can take a look at our Top Laptop CPU Ranking, where we showcase the best and the newest laptop processors.
You can find more information about both CPUs here: Intel Core i7-1195G7 / Core i7-1165G7
Specs table
| Intel Core i7-1195G7 | Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Tiger Lake UP3 | Tiger Lake UP3 |
| Cores / Threads | 4/8 | 4/8 |
| Clock Speeds – Base/Boost | 2.90 – 5.00GHz | 2.80 – 4.40GHz |
| Cache | 12MB | 12MB |
| Lithography | 10nm | 10nm |
| TDP | up to 28W | 12 / 15 / 28W |
| Memory type |
DDR4–3200MHz,
LPDDR4x–4267MHz
|
DDR4-3200MHz, LPDDR4x-4267MHz |
| Integrated GPU | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) |
CPU benchmarks
As expected, the CPU results that the two notebooks provide are very similar. In 3D Rendering, the Core i7-1165G7 leads with a 3% higher score. On the other hand, the i7-1195G7 is 0.6 seconds quicker in Photoshop.
Results are from the Cinebench R23 CPU test (the higher the score, the better)
Results are from our Photoshop benchmark test (the lower the score, the better)
GPU benchmarks
The GPU benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the i7-1165G7 being only 0.45% faster in 3DMark Fire Strike. Its opponent quickly recovered in Unigine Superposition, delivering a 6% higher score. In the gaming tests, the FPS differences were very small and negligible.
Results are from the 3DMark: Time Spy (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the 3DMark: Fire Strike (Graphics) benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the 3DMark: Wild Life benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Results are from the Unigine Superposition benchmark (higher the score, the better)
Gaming tests
| CS:GO | HD 1080p, Low (Check settings) | HD 1080p, Medium (Check settings) | HD 1080p, MAX (Check settings) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) – Core i7-1195G7 | 83 fps (+14%) | 61 fps (+2%) | 28 fps (+4%) |
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) – Core i7-1165G7 | 73 fps | 60 fps | 27 fps |
| DOTA 2 | HD 1080p, Low (Check settings) | HD 1080p, Normal (Check settings) | HD 1080p, High (Check settings) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) – Core i7-1195G7 | 90 fps | 57 fps | 35 fps (+6%) |
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) – Core i7-1165G7 | 95 fps (+6%) | 57 fps | 33 fps |
Conclusion
In conclusion, the difference between the two CPUs is negligible and so little that you’d hardly notice it. Both the CPU and GPU performance is very similar. Choosing between the two should be done on a laptop per laptop basis, as every device differs a lot when it comes to its thermal management. You should also factor in the price of the laptop of choice.
All laptops with the Intel Core i7-1195G7:
![[Video Review] ASUS Vivobook S 14 Flip OLED TN3402 – Offering a lot for its price](https://www.laptopmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/3402-375x250.jpg)
![[Specs and Info] ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (FA617) – Going against the grain](https://www.laptopmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ASUSTUFGamingA16-375x250.jpg)
![[Video Review] ASUS Vivobook Pro 16X OLED M7600 – A well rounded package with an everlasting battery](https://www.laptopmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/m7600-375x250.jpg)
